PegLeg replied to Evidence of FIFA "BS" in fifa code. inisettings file from pc game files on November 5, 2019 4:32PM
Arsenalman wrote: »Boommaametw3 wrote: »BombSquadPuppy wrote: »Pocketsquareguy wrote: »Boommaametw3 wrote: »Pocketsquareguy wrote: »The servers are bad. But they aren’t responsible for as much as people like to think. That is all I will say.
explain the code then. If ahead by 2 goals; increase difficulty by 0.25
I’m saying what you posted is likely something that is blamed on the servers more often than it should be.
Based on what? Your insider knowledge?
Hes saying these are thing most people blame on lagg and server issues, when its clearly coded in the game to aid the lesser players
There is a significant amount of evidence out there on the performance and impact of EAs servers on the the game. There is zero evidence that the settings posted impact the behaviour of FUT online (actual evidence not just conspiracy theories)
Although using an INI file like this for something as fundamental as balancing difficulty in the game (whether offline, online or both) is pretty amateur stuff from EAs developers. In which case yeah actually it does make sense
Even offline it's a pretty **** approach if the game still allows you to select a difficulty in the first place
EA denied it that dynamic difficulty exist in the game. EA corey or whatever said it doesn't exist in fifa at all. So why is these code in fifa game files???
Zero evidence?
Last year it came out that EA spent lots of money to patent Dynamic difficulty in the gaming industry.
Now you see dynamic difficulty in the code of fifa and say zero evidence?
Many people experience this things in game
1) I never said it wasn't in the game, learn to read. I just questioned what evidence there is which proves it affects online games where there is no such thing as beginner/amateur/pro/legendary difficulty levels which are referenced in the file
2) Dynamic difficulty has been used in gaming since the 70s, I haven't read EAs patent but it would be odd for them to be granted one for something which isn't even new. Unless they've patented a new method for doing it (the INI rules posted suggest it's just about as simplistic an approach as you can get)
It’s in the game we don’t need to see any code it’s so obvious, if you’ve never experienced it fine but too much people experience it for anybody to question it, there’s no smoke without fire. If I say I say I find it harder to defend after I just scored someone will blame me “ maybe it’s your nerves “ I can predict too much scenarios and this isn’t just me. Sometimes I wonder about all these people that question if it exists they have to be trolling
Jesus, why can't people read? I didn't say 'I've never experienced it'
November 5, 2019 4:32PM Posted in
