Renamed123456 replied to Can't find a formation i enjoy on November 7, 2019 4:20AM
Renamed123456 wrote: »4141 - have the cdm drop between the CBs, the full backs on attack and the wingers on come inside and stay forward.
It will be a little bit wider than Liverpool's forward line but the 'duel 8s (Silva and Kdb)', single screening cdm and flying fullbacks are all there
Is first formation I'm testing when i get on. Then will test the 451(2) -- the LMRM look tucked a little more inside than on most formations, will see if it plays that way.
Look forward to hearing how it goes. I enjoyed it last year but so far the 4231 is more effective so far
4141 and 451(2)
Not so keen on either.
They kinda seemed alright or interesting, but i could really feel the lack of attacking threat compared to formations that use wingers instead of LM RM.
In the 451 i feel the CMs attack a bit more than the 4141, I expected it to be the other way around.
The wingers did generally seem to get to where i wanted them (i think) just it took longer for them to do it, and i think the way the team built up the spaces felt not great.
This is only after a couple of games though and could simply be down to being unfamiliar with the formations or used to my 433 or 343 where my squad gets forward rather quick.
I think i preferred the 4141 tho i really wanted to like the 451(2).
I might try 4321 and 433(4) next. Tempted to try 433(3) and see how those CDM feel, but fearing a disconnect between attack and defense.
November 7, 2019 4:20AM Posted in