Vazquez or zaha?
If i go for zaha he'd replace my rashford who atm is op an i love using him.
If i go vazquez i loose dembele who is dead after 70mins an i have to force a sub. Yes theres messi as an option. Like dembele tho he too is dead after 70 an costs 1.2mill where money can be spent better imo.
If these upgrade thats where i wonder.
Anyone tested either? Whos my better option?
November 4, 2019 10:10AM Posted in Ultimate Team General Discussion
author_name
Retropoe82
author_link
https://fifaforums.easports.comRetropoe82
post_raw_date
November 4, 2019 10:10AM
source_url
https://fifaforums.easports.com/en/discussion/512553/vazquez-or-zaha
freakjas replied to Vazquez or zaha? on November 4, 2019 10:47AM
Went for Vazquez as I don’t use pl and he looked better imo but he hasn’t been amazing.
Couple games as rm and subbed in on a few times at rm or cam and yeah he’s been average.
12:30 pm, November 5, 2019 Ultimate Team General Discussion
Retropoe82 replied to Vazquez or zaha? on November 5, 2019 12:28PM
Thanks for the advice lads in the end i went with vazquez
After 12 games so far i feel i made the rite choice. pld 12 gls 6 assists 7
Pro's & Con's..
Pros- his ability on the ball. If you like messi an ben yedder. This guys just as good imo. In capable hands the ball sticks to his feet like glue.
Passing on this card is really good. Shooting can be hit an miss but gets into the space.
Con's- he's abit weak played him both rm an st. His hold up play no good an on the turn if nudged looses the ball.
Sprint speed. The only noticable con with the card. Im using sniper atm so really buffed up his dribbling an shooting. Off the hes good but when you need 10yrds he get caught easily
Overall its a good choice an im happy. As a striker his passing comes in real handy an his ability on the ball makes defenders like sanchez, laporte types look stationary.
Zaha i had no links an wernt replacing rashy. An tolisso 1 inform an you'll have the same card, plus i couldn't fit him in or willing to ditch my la liga clan as i really like otw de jong.
Thanks lads
12:30 pm, November 5, 2019 Ultimate Team General Discussion
Raider replied to Vazquez or zaha? on November 4, 2019 10:18AM
i went for vazquez, his upgrade was biggest out of the 3, and the 97 stamina on a player will be helpful, also he can play anywhere at front, striker, cam, wing, has 4/4
12:30 pm, November 5, 2019 Ultimate Team General Discussion
DropbackKid replied to Vazquez or zaha? on November 4, 2019 10:16AM
What formation are u using?
I would never replace Rashford by Zaha... Same as I would never replace Dembele by Vazquez; both could be supersubs.
You can use Vazquez at 7 chem on your midfield I guess (in a 41212 or 4312 formation). He does not have dramatic defending stats!
12:30 pm, November 5, 2019 Ultimate Team General Discussion
CustardHippo replied to Vazquez or zaha? on November 4, 2019 10:33AM
Retropoe82 wrote: »Tough call for me here. Ive pique an have a la liga english mix.
If i go for zaha he'd replace my rashford who atm is op an i love using him.
If i go vazquez i loose dembele who is dead after 70mins an i have to force a sub. Yes theres messi as an option. Like dembele tho he too is dead after 70 an costs 1.2mill where money can be spent better imo.
If these upgrade thats where i wonder.
Anyone tested either? Whos my better option?
I stopped reading at money can be spent better than on Messi.
What are you doing to players to have them dead at 70mins?
12:30 pm, November 5, 2019 Ultimate Team General Discussion