Renamed123456 replied to 433(4) Vs 352? on November 7, 2019 6:30AM
433(2/5) is better for passing options in attack
433(4) is better for passing options in defense
In (4) you only get 1-2 attacking triangle available at a time. With the (2) (or (5)), you have 3 attacking triangles available. When fullbacks join attack you get 5 triangles.
433(4)
433(2)
Also with the (2/5) you have a CDM. I just played a bunch of games with the (4) and you can feel the lack of passing option sometimes, big gap between the CAM and winger at times. (You can see the distance in the image. Whereas the 2 and 5 you can move it about easier.
In 352 you generally have to get the ball to your strikers ASAP as building up from your midfield isn't great, i often find myself hard-driven from CDM to ST constantly in 352 then layoff or 1-2 with the ST and CAM.
433 is always best, easiest, smoothest for passing.
433(4) is better for passing options in defense
In (4) you only get 1-2 attacking triangle available at a time. With the (2) (or (5)), you have 3 attacking triangles available. When fullbacks join attack you get 5 triangles.
433(4)
433(2)
Also with the (2/5) you have a CDM. I just played a bunch of games with the (4) and you can feel the lack of passing option sometimes, big gap between the CAM and winger at times. (You can see the distance in the image. Whereas the 2 and 5 you can move it about easier.
In 352 you generally have to get the ball to your strikers ASAP as building up from your midfield isn't great, i often find myself hard-driven from CDM to ST constantly in 352 then layoff or 1-2 with the ST and CAM.
433 is always best, easiest, smoothest for passing.
November 7, 2019 6:30AM Posted in
